Gasio v. Tran et al. · Case File for Counsel Review
OC Superior Court · No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC · Dept. C61
Documentary Record
SUN REALTY DBA EXPIRED WITH DRE 02/24/2015 · signage and active solicitation by Anna Ly broker #01894348 in May 2022 — approximately 7 years 3 months post-expiration — from residential corner property 1532 Orchard Dr, Newport Beach 92660NO BROKERAGE OFFICE OF RECORD · DRE consumer license lookup pulled twice with identical results (Apr 28 + Apr 30 2026) · no current DBAs, no current branches, no affiliated licensed corporations · Anna Ly broker #01894348DOCUMENTARY ORIGIN OF MOVE-OUT CLEARANCE REPORT · transmitted Aug 22, 2024 11:16 PM PDT from personal Yahoo address lymyhoa@yahoo.com to Silverstein clerk inbox · reply chain originates at Dr Phat Tran DMD Inc dental office, 14411 Brookhurst St, Garden Grove — not a brokerage channelFAMILY NETWORK OF RECORD · Phat L.K. Tran (DDS, owner of subject property) · Thao Thu Tran (spouse per Cal. SOS filings, person of record on 2018 docket overlap) · Anna Ly broker #01894348 (listing broker, 2022) — tied through AP Silk Arts Inc co-registrationEVICTION COUNSEL OF RECORD · Steven D. Silverstein, CA Bar #86466 · reported judge pro tem service across multiple California Superior Courts · same eviction counsel of record across Tran v. Bach (2018), prior Brynn Court tenancy, and the present matterPATTERN-OF-PRACTICE QUESTION · same Move-Out Clearance Report template · same pre-printed “Attorney Fees” line · same eviction counsel · documentary record bears examination of whether material submitted by counsel as advocate would be sustained by counsel as judicial officerLY CONSTRUCTION INVOICE #2412 · charge against deposit dated Aug 5, 2024 · supporting invoice dated Aug 14, 2024 · charge pre-dates supporting invoice by 9 days · vinyl-plank flooring billed to departing tenant as carpet damageCITY INSPECTOR CLEARANCE · issued 18 days before Ly Construction Invoice #2412 · confirmed no pet damage and clean carpetsNo finding has been made by any court or regulatory body in any matter, including this one.SUN REALTY DBA EXPIRED WITH DRE 02/24/2015 · signage and active solicitation by Anna Ly broker #01894348 in May 2022 — approximately 7 years 3 months post-expiration — from residential corner property 1532 Orchard Dr, Newport Beach 92660NO BROKERAGE OFFICE OF RECORD · DRE consumer license lookup pulled twice with identical results (Apr 28 + Apr 30 2026) · no current DBAs, no current branches, no affiliated licensed corporations · Anna Ly broker #01894348DOCUMENTARY ORIGIN OF MOVE-OUT CLEARANCE REPORT · transmitted Aug 22, 2024 11:16 PM PDT from personal Yahoo address lymyhoa@yahoo.com to Silverstein clerk inbox · reply chain originates at Dr Phat Tran DMD Inc dental office, 14411 Brookhurst St, Garden Grove — not a brokerage channelFAMILY NETWORK OF RECORD · Phat L.K. Tran (DDS, owner of subject property) · Thao Thu Tran (spouse per Cal. SOS filings, person of record on 2018 docket overlap) · Anna Ly broker #01894348 (listing broker, 2022) — tied through AP Silk Arts Inc co-registrationEVICTION COUNSEL OF RECORD · Steven D. Silverstein, CA Bar #86466 · reported judge pro tem service across multiple California Superior Courts · same eviction counsel of record across Tran v. Bach (2018), prior Brynn Court tenancy, and the present matterPATTERN-OF-PRACTICE QUESTION · same Move-Out Clearance Report template · same pre-printed “Attorney Fees” line · same eviction counsel · documentary record bears examination of whether material submitted by counsel as advocate would be sustained by counsel as judicial officerLY CONSTRUCTION INVOICE #2412 · charge against deposit dated Aug 5, 2024 · supporting invoice dated Aug 14, 2024 · charge pre-dates supporting invoice by 9 days · vinyl-plank flooring billed to departing tenant as carpet damageCITY INSPECTOR CLEARANCE · issued 18 days before Ly Construction Invoice #2412 · confirmed no pet damage and clean carpetsNo finding has been made by any court or regulatory body in any matter, including this one.
Section 01 of 12 · Home
Gasio v. Tran et al.
A documented record of conduct surrounding a residential tenancy at 19235 Brynn Court, Huntington Beach, California — May 2022 through August 2024.
What this site is
This site presents primary documents and a neutral chronology relating to a tenancy that began on May 1, 2022 and ended on August 5, 2024 with the plaintiffs vacating under an unlawful detainer judgment.
It is not an advocacy site. It does not assert legal conclusions. It organizes the source documents — contracts, emails, text messages, USPS tracking records, bank records, court filings, and agency correspondence — in a sequence that allows counsel to evaluate the matter in approximately thirty minutes.
Each statement on this site is anchored to a primary document available in Section 10.
After the tenants vacated voluntarily on August 5, 2024, a Move-Out Clearance Report was submitted claiming damages. The damage charges on that report match the security deposit held to the penny — producing a specific non-round net balance. The probability of independently derived actual repair costs arriving at that exact figure by coincidence is vanishingly small.
The same report double-charges two months of rent already documented as received in the landlord’s own written admissions. The April 19 wire transfer and the May 30 cashier’s check — both confirmed received and acknowledged in writing — were charged again as unpaid on the same document. The source documents establishing these facts are organized in the sections that follow.
Audio Case Brief — 62.5 minutes
Listen before you read
A complete spoken summary of the documented record — formatted for commute review. Covers all key evidence, agency proceedings, and the four-count fraud sequence.
The following items appear on the face of the source documents. Each is anchored to a primary exhibit and to a statutory provision that governs the underlying conduct. No legal conclusion is asserted; the documents are presented for counsel’s independent evaluation.
Three-Day Notice without signatureThe Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit served on June 21, 2024 bears the typed name “PHAT L.K. TRAN” but contains no handwritten signature, electronic signature notation, or attorney signature block.Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1161 · See Section 3
Payment account in notice differs from payment account in leaseThe executed lease (April 26, 2024) directs rent to Wells Fargo account #3312943297 in the name of Hanson Le. The Three-Day Notice (June 21, 2024) directs payment to Wells Fargo account #1005959166. The two accounts are not the same.Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1161; Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 10145 · See Sections 3 and 5
Tendered cashier’s check not creditedA cashier’s check for $4,338.48 was sent via USPS Certified Mail to Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices on May 28, 2024 (tracking #9534914882764149935944), delivered May 30, 2024, signed for by “H H.” The Court’s March 27, 2025 minute order acknowledges the tender. The funds were not credited to the rent account.18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1708 · See Section 4
Rent directed to broker’s personal account, not broker trust accountThe 2024 lease names Hanson Le as broker/property manager and routes rent to a Wells Fargo account in his personal name. California regulation requires real estate brokers to handle client funds through designated trust accounts.Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 10145 · See Section 5
Forty-eight-hour pre-move-in modification of executed lease terms (2022)A Residential Lease (Document A, DocuSign Envelope E1408B26) was executed on April 21, 2022. One day later, the listing agent of record sent a text stating there was no dog addendum. The following morning, a “revised lease contract” was emailed adding a $1,000 pet deposit and directing rent to Wells Fargo account ending …9166 — the same account named in the June 21, 2024 Three-Day Notice twenty-six months later. A second lease (Document B, Envelope 5D80110C) was executed before the tenancy commenced.Cal. Civ. Code § 1572 (actual fraud); Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 10176 · See Section 5
Documented inducement to remain followed by restructured lease terms (2024)On April 2, 2024, the owner wrote: “please do not think we’re looking new lessee.” Twenty-four days after the email, a new thirteen-month lease was executed at $5,350/month (an increase from the prior $5,000), with rent routed to the broker’s personal account.Cal. Civ. Code § 1572; Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 10176 · See Sections 2 and 5
Repair-and-deduct exercised; notice ignored the deductionAfter the owner failed to repair a broken dishwasher reported March 5, 2024, the plaintiffs purchased a replacement from The Home Depot on May 15, 2024 for $1,011.52. The May 28 cashier’s check tendered the lawful net rent ($5,350 less the deduction). The June 21 Three-Day Notice demanded the gross amount as if no deduction had occurred.Cal. Civ. Code § 1942 · See Sections 2 and 4
Move-out document executed by individual whose authority had terminatedThe Move Out Clearance Report (DocuSign Envelope F5D247C2) bears Anna Ly’s electronic signature. Documented texts establish her management role had previously terminated.Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 10130; Cal. Civ. Code § 1950.5 · See Section 5
Pre-existing habitability defects — not disclosed at listingA photograph taken at 11:39 AM on May 1, 2022 — move-in day — documents established black mold colonies in the under-sink kitchen cabinet. The listing agent acknowledged the kitchen electrical defect as a construction issue in a text message on May 6, 2022, six days after move-in. No disclosure of mold, electrical defects, roof leak, or rotten subfloor was made at listing.Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1941.1, 1102; Cal. H&S Code § 17920.3 · See Section 8
Voluntary move-out with rent current; payments routed electronically to owner rather than trust accountThe tenants vacated voluntarily on August 5, 2024. No sheriff lockout was executed; rent was current through the last day. Wells Fargo wire transfer records show rent was routed electronically to the owner’s personal name rather than to a designated real estate trust account throughout the tenancy. The sole non-electronic payment was the May 28, 2024 USPS cashier’s check addressed in item 3 above.Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 10145; Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1161 · See Sections 2, 3, 4, and 5
What counsel review is being requested
The plaintiffs are seeking limited-scope or full representation by counsel with experience in California real estate fraud and unlawful business practices (Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 10145, 10176, 17200); civil claims for wrongful eviction and breach of the implied covenant of quiet enjoyment; coordination with active agency proceedings (see Section 7); and, where appropriate, criminal-referral support to relevant federal and state authorities.
Scope and methodology. This site presents only what appears in primary documents available for inspection in Section 10. No statement on this site characterizes any individual as having committed a crime; criminal liability is determined by qualified prosecutors and courts, not by the plaintiffs or by this site. Statutory citations are provided to assist counsel in identifying the legal frameworks that govern the documented conduct. The plaintiffs make no assertion of legal conclusion.
Begin with the chronology
The most efficient way to evaluate this matter is to read Section 2 (Chronology), then Section 3 (The Notice), then Section 4 (Cure Tender). Together these three sections present the core fact pattern in approximately fifteen minutes of reading.
Notice to reader · scope and disclaimers
This site is a public-interest case file assembled and published by Michael A. Gasio, plaintiff pro se in Gasio v. Tran et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC. The plaintiff is not an attorney. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice.
Every factual assertion is drawn from primary documents — executed contracts, bank records, emails, text messages, court filings, public licensing records, and public-records directory entries — preserved in the case file and referenced by source and date.
No statement on this site should be read as a determination that any named person has committed a crime, violated a statute, or breached a professional duty. Those determinations are reserved to qualified counsel, regulatory agencies, and the courts.
This publication is made in the exercise of rights protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 2 of the California Constitution, California Civil Code § 47(d), and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.