§ Gasio v. Tran — Case File for Counsel Review
Actor Dossier · Dennis Allen Rosas
Court
Orange County Superior Court
Venue
Dept. C61 · Comm. Snuggs-Spraggins
Case Number
30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Court
OC Superior Court · Dept. C61
Case Number
30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Bench Officer
Comm. Snuggs-Spraggins
Case Type
Unlawful Detainer — Limited Civil
Property
19235 Brynn Ct, Huntington Beach 92648
Tenancy
May 2022 — Aug 5, 2024 (28 months)
Outcome
Plaintiff vacated · sealed cure tender preserved
Primary Statutes
B&P §§10145, 10159.2, 10176, 10177(g), 10177(h)
← Return to Case-File Index
Cover — for the reviewer in a hurry

The Designated Officer of Record above Hanson Le

Mr. Rosas is the corporate-broker Designated Officer of Record for both Stratton-LFCA, Inc. (Mr. Le’s current attachment) and Springdale Marina Inc. (Mr. Le’s attachment at the time of the April 26, 2024 lease execution). Both corporate licenses operate Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties as a DBA. Mr. Rosas was Designated Officer of Record for the corporate broker (Mulhearn Realtors Inc.) on the day he personally signed DRE Stipulation H-41672 LA on January 5, 2021 — a public reproval that admitted unlicensed mortgage-loan-originator activity, substantial misrepresentation under B&P §10176(a), and negligence under B&P §10177(g) — three years before the Gasio lease was executed under his ongoing supervisory umbrella.

The plaintiff has documented two direct phone calls from Mr. Rosas in which Mr. Rosas explicitly refused to investigate his supervised licensee. Both refusals are on the record. The second refusal occurred during active trial in Gasio v. Tran.

Roadmap of this dossier:

  1. License and corporate structure — the seven Rosas-affiliated licenses, the Coldwell Banker Envision and BHHS California Properties DBAs, the Hacienda Heights and Covina office addresses, the affiliated Castlehead Inc. Escrows and Orange Coast Title Co. operations.
  2. Industry leadership and biographical record — CSU Fullerton; 1988 President of the Whittier District Board of REALTORS; 1991 California Association of REALTORS Regional Vice President; 1994 Chairman of the CAR Board Presidents Forum; member of The Realty Alliance since 2013.
  3. The two documented refusals — Call #1 (2024, Omaha-routed — by the plaintiff’s account, Mr. Rosas declined to investigate and characterized such conduct as widespread) and Call #2 (February 3, 2025, 12:55 PM PST during active trial — by the plaintiff’s account, Mr. Rosas stated he had said the same a year earlier and again declined to investigate, documenting independent self-corroboration of the prior refusal); plus the February 13, 2024 inbound call documenting continued direct outreach during pendency of the pre-complaints.
  4. Direct notice via BHHS corporate web-form channels — two submissions to the company’s own published contact forms (the BHHS California Properties franchise and the BHHS HomeServices parent), each naming Mr. Le, the property, and the cashier’s check; both submissions preserved as inline screenshots; no documented corporate response.
  5. Alleged charges — six counts spanning failure to supervise, §10159.2 designated-officer liability, the thirty-year prior-discipline pattern (H-24244 LA / H-24243 LA / H-28384 LA / H-41672 LA), Sandoval branch-manager notice chain, the dual-corporate-DBA anomaly, and the BHHS-corporate-web-form direct-notice channels.
  6. Primary sources — fourteen primary-source anchors with full citations, including the May 18, 2020 H-41672 LA filing record (Julie L. To DRE Counsel SBN 219482; Chika Sunquist Supervising Special Investigator, signed May 4, 2020) and the two BHHS corporate-web-form submission exhibits.
By the plaintiff’s account, the Designated Officer declined to investigate the supervised licensee — saying, in substance, that if anything had been taken the licensee was probably moonlighting, and that such conduct was widespread.
— Plaintiff’s contemporaneous recollection of Dennis Allen Rosas, Designated Officer of Record · Call #1, 2024 · Recollection pending verification · Alleged refusal of the statutory supervisory duty

License and corporate structure

DRE Broker License
#00602101
Licensed March 7, 1986 · 40+ years in practice
Personal license: no public discipline
(disciplinary actions are against corporate brokers, with Mr. Rosas signing as D.O.)
Hub Title (Public)
President & Principal Broker
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices
California Properties
(per Broker Resource Network “Meet The Network” profile)
President, COO & Broker of Record
Coldwell Banker Envision
(per coldwellbankerenvision.com profile)
Coldwell Banker Envision Office
16404 Colima Road
Hacienda Heights, CA 91745
Tel: 562.860.2625
(public profile contact of record)
Realtor.com Office
1270 E Garvey St Ste 100
Covina, CA 91724
(public Realtor.com profile contact)
Listed firm: Berkshire Hathaway Homeservice
Corporate License 1
Springdale Marina Inc — DRE #01208606
DBA: BHHS California Properties (since 02/06/2014)
5848 Edinger Ave, HB 92649
Status: LICENSED · Expires 05/02/2028
Hanson Le's attachment at lease execution.
Corporate License 2
Stratton-LFCA, Inc. — DRE #02211662
DBA: Coldwell Banker Envision + BHHS California Properties (since 04/04/2023) + 5 other Coldwell Banker DBAs
15025 East Whittier Blvd, Whittier 90603
Status: LICENSED · Issued 03/06/2023 · Expires 03/05/2027
Hanson Le's current Broker-Associate attachment.
Corporate License 3
S J Heritage Inc — DRE #00808075
DBA: BHHS California Properties (since 03/17/2014) + Coldwell Banker Envision + The Prudential California Realty
9003 Reseda Blvd Ste 105, Northridge 91324
Status: LICENSED · Issued 03/17/1981 · Expires 03/16/2029
Two prior DRE disciplinary actions on corporate record (1986, 1999)
Prior Corporate License
Mulhearn Realtors Inc — DRE #00338699
EXPIRED 09/26/2024
Original main address: 18000 Studebaker Rd Ste 600, Cerritos, CA
Subject of three DRE disciplinary proceedings (1991, 2000, 2021)
Mr. Rosas signed the 2021 stipulation as D.O.
Affiliated Operations
Castlehead Inc. Escrows
BHHS-affiliated independent escrow operation
~20 locations in 4 counties
Mr. Rosas: corporate officer

Orange Coast Title Co.
Per public Broker Resource Network profile:
“active in our related title operation”
Title company on Hanson Le’s December 2017 home purchase.
Industry Leadership Record
1988 · President, Whittier District Board of REALTORS
(now Pacific West Association of Realtors)
1991 · 22nd District Regional VP
California Association of REALTORS (CAR)
1994 · Chairman, CAR Board Presidents Forum
Director: CAR + National Association of REALTORS
2013–present · Member, The Realty Alliance
Education & Background
California State University, Fullerton
Bachelor's, Business Administration
Second-generation real estate professional
(mother was a successful REALTOR; raised in Montebello)
January 1986 · Founded Home Brokers Inc. of Whittier
1993 · Merged into Mulhearn / Gallery of Homes
2009 · General Manager, Mulhearn chain
Late 2018 · President & Principal Broker, BHHS Cal. Properties
Firm Metrics (Self-Reported)
Top 200 brokerage in U.S.
(out of 75,000+ U.S. firms)
800+ sales agents (per BHHS bio)
1,300+ agents (per Coldwell Banker Envision bio)
$1.5B+ combined annual sales volume
“Gibraltar Club” member — BHHS top 50 network
Prior DRE Discipline — As Designated Officer
H-41672 LA — Public Reproval
Filed: May 18, 2020 by DRE LA Office
Counsel: Julie L. To, SBN 219482
Signed by: Chika Sunquist, Supervising Special Investigator (May 4, 2020)
Stipulation signed by Mr. Rosas as D.O. of Mulhearn Realtors Inc — Jan 5, 2021
Effective: March 4, 2021
§10166.02 unlicensed MLO activity
§10176(a) substantial misrepresentation
§10177(g) negligence
under BHHS California Properties DBA — 3 years before the Gasio lease
DRE Pre-Complaint Filed
Pre-Complaint filed April 24, 2026
Five counts · Companion to Le and Sandoval
Coordinate with PC #1-26-0304-002
(Le pre-complaint with Investigator Macias)
No formal investigation has been opened.
No finding has been made.
BHHS Corporate Web-Form Notice
Two direct submissions to BHHS corporate channels through their own websites' published contact forms:

(1) BHHS California Properties
“General Question” form · bhhscalifornia.com
(the franchise Mr. Rosas leads as President)

(2) BHHS HomeServices — Parent Company
“How can we assist you?” form
(the national franchisor)

Both submissions named Hanson Le, the property at 19235 Brynn Court, the cashier’s check, the three-day notice, and the demand for response.
BHHS submission record preserved.
No corporate response on the documentary record.
Corporate-structure note — verified DRE record, April 28, 2026

As of April 28, 2026, three currently active California corporate broker licenses on which Dennis Allen Rosas (#00602101) is Designated Officer of Record concurrently hold the “Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties” DBA registration: Springdale Marina Inc (#01208606, DBA active since 02/06/2014); S J Heritage Inc (#00808075, DBA active since 03/17/2014); Stratton-LFCA, Inc. (#02211662, DBA active since 04/04/2023). The corporate licensee operating the Huntington Beach branch at 5848 Edinger Avenue at the time of the April 26, 2024 lease was Springdale Marina Inc. The corporate licensee operating the Huntington Beach branch at 120 5th Street Suite C110 (current Sandoval branch of record) is Stratton-LFCA, Inc. Two of the six Rosas-affiliated corporate licenses carry public DRE disciplinary case numbers totaling five proceedings; personal license #00602101 carries no public disciplinary record. Full inventory at brokerage-structure.html Section 3.

The three documented contacts

Rosas Call #1 — 2024 (Omaha-Routed) — Explicit Refusal #1

BHHS Omaha routed Complainant’s complaint to Rosas directly. Rosas called Complainant. When Complainant raised the cashier’s check interception and asked whether Le had a connection to Thao Tran, Rosas responded (Complainant’s contemporaneous recollection):

By the plaintiff’s contemporaneous recollection, Mr. Rosas stated, in substance, that he had known Mr. Le personally and worked with him for many years, that Mr. Le was long-married and would not do anything like this, that he would not investigate, that if anything had been taken from the office the licensee was probably moonlighting — that such conduct was widespread — and that Mr. Le was a good person.

Legal significance: (1) the stated refusal to investigate is, as alleged, an explicit refusal of the §10159.2 supervisory duty; (2) the statement that such conduct is widespread is alleged to acknowledge a known, tolerated pattern — systemic supervision failure under §10177(h); (3) by the plaintiff’s account, Mr. Rosas did not address the question raised about any possible connection to Thao Tran.

Rosas Call #2 — February 3, 2025, 12:55 PM PST — During Active Trial — Self-Corroborated

Trial in three-week recess. Rosas called back and stated, in substance, that he had spoken with the plaintiff a year earlier — by the plaintiff’s account independently corroborating Call #1.

The plaintiff, by his account, told Mr. Rosas in substance that he should contact Silverstein, who was presenting a Berkshire contract for which the payment had been received.

By the plaintiff’s account, Mr. Rosas responded briefly, in substance, that he had said the year before there would be no investigation of Mr. Le, and ended the call.

Legal significance: Call #2 occurs during active litigation in which Springdale Marina Inc’s own instrument was being used as evidence of non-payment. Mr. Rosas was told the brokerage held the payment and refused to contact eviction counsel. Refusal during active proceedings is alleged within 18 U.S.C. §1512(b).

Rosas Call #3 — February 13, 2024 · 2:37 PM PT — Inbound — Pre-Complaint Pending

Phone log entry: “Dennis Rosas, Berksh…” · California · 2:37 PM · call ended by caller (Mr. Rosas hung up). Inbound call from Mr. Le’s Designated Officer of Record to Plaintiff during the period DRE Pre-Complaint #1-26-0304-002 (Hanson Le, Investigator Macias intake) was pending. Carrier records preserved.

Legal significance: Documents continued direct outreach by the Designated Officer of Record above the licensee subject of an active pre-complaint, after Mr. Rosas had twice on the record refused to investigate that licensee. The pattern of incoming calls from Mr. Rosas, in the absence of any documented internal supervision response, is preserved as a primary-source anchor for the §10159.2 supervisory-liability framework.

Direct notice via BHHS corporate web-form channels

In addition to the three documented voice contacts above, the Plaintiff transmitted notice of Mr. Le’s alleged conduct through the public contact-form channels published on the websites of both the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties franchise (the corporate-broker DBA under Mr. Rosas’s ongoing supervision) and the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices national franchisor. Each form requires the inquirer to identify themselves, completes a reCAPTCHA verification, and submits through the company’s own infrastructure. The submission record is preserved on the Plaintiff’s side; the form metadata is on BHHS’s side. No corporate response is on the documentary record.

Form 1 of 2 BHHS California Properties — “General Question” web form bhhscalifornia.com / contact form · reCAPTCHA verified · submitted

Submission to Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties — the corporate-broker DBA under Mr. Rosas’s ongoing supervisory umbrella, operated through Stratton-LFCA Inc., S J Heritage Inc., and (until expiration) Mulhearn Realtors Inc., all on which Mr. Rosas is or was Designated Officer of Record. From: Michael Gasio · gasio77@yahoo.com · 559-287-9955. Q: “Are you currently working with an agent?” — Answered: No.

Plaintiff submission to BHHS California Properties ‘General Question’ web form, naming Hanson Le and the property at 19235 Brynn Court
Exhibit — submission as displayed in the BHHS California Properties “General Question” form interface

Plaintiff’s submitted text (verbatim):

“Mr. Phat Tran hired your Agent Mr. Hanson Le to manage his property at 19235 Brynn Ct, Huntington Beach CA. Today I was served a 3 day notice to vacate. WE have a new contract for that property with you. we have been at for 3 contracts. Mr. Hanson Le texted me he was giving me a new routing number but failed to due so. .. I we sent a Cashers Check in May 2024 to you Registered mail the owner said you never notified him? It was addressed manager payment enclosed and signed for by you. Please get back Monday as Tuesday I am calling HB Police about this fraudster and your not responding to my documents showing fraud changing my contract after 25 th payment 10 days later new terms. No help on Mold.”

Form 2 of 2 BHHS HomeServices — National “How can we assist you?” web form bhhs.com / corporate-parent form · reCAPTCHA verified · submitted

Submission to Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices at the parent-company level. Form notice on the page itself states: “Please provide as much information as possible. The information you submit may be shared with our independently owned and operated franchisees. By providing your contact information, you are providing consent for us and/or our franchisees to contact you regarding your inquiry.” Inquiry type selected from dropdown: “Property management / Rental property matter.” Country: United States. State: CA. City: Huntington Beach. Office named: Berkshire Hathaway California Homes. Agent named on form: “Hanson Tri Le (714-554-9989) #01358448.”

Phone-number anomaly preserved: the BHHS-corporate-form record lists Mr. Le at (714) 554-9989. The Authentisign lease at Section 32 lists Mr. Le’s mobile as (714) 720-5447. The two numbers are independent data points; both are preserved as documentary record. Subpoena targets: T-Mobile / carrier records for both numbers, April 26 – June 21, 2024.

Plaintiff submission to BHHS national ‘How can we assist you?’ corporate-parent web form, naming Hanson Tri Le and the April 26 2024 contract
Exhibit — submission as displayed in the BHHS national “How can we assist you?” form interface

Plaintiff’s submitted text (verbatim, message field):

“Whether I should pay your agents’ private bank as instructed in a text from Hanson Le. As my phone is currently broken, please respond to this inquiry via email at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Contract date 4/26/2024 owner Phat Tran was served a 3 day notice please help us…”

Both submissions are preserved on the Plaintiff’s record. Each transmission was made through the company’s own infrastructure to the corporate channel the company itself publishes for inquiries about its agents. The corporate response in each case has not appeared on the documentary record. The notice channels are anchored as additional evidence of constructive corporate notice flowing up the §10159.2 supervisory chain to Mr. Rosas as Designated Officer of Record.

Alleged charges — six counts

Count IQuestion Presented — Failure to Supervise — Two Explicit Refusals to Investigate, Plus a Third Inbound Contact During Pre-Complaint PendencyB&P §10177(h) · B&P §10159.2

Mr. Rosas received direct verbal notice of the cashier’s check interception in 2024 and again February 3, 2025. Both times he explicitly refused to investigate. A third inbound contact (February 13, 2024) is preserved as carrier-record evidence of continued direct outreach during pendency of DRE Pre-Complaint #1-26-0304-002.

AnchorSignificance
Rosas Call #1 (2024) · Omaha-routedBy the plaintiff’s account, Mr. Rosas declined to investigate and characterized such conduct as widespread. Alleged explicit refusal.
Rosas Call #2 (Feb 3, 2025, 12:55 PM PST)By the plaintiff’s account, Mr. Rosas stated he had said the same a year earlier and again declined to investigate. Self-corroborates Call #1. During active trial. 18 U.S.C. §1512(b) framework.
Rosas Call #3 (Feb 13, 2024 · 2:37 PM PT) · Inbound · Carrier logCall ended by caller (carrier log). Direct contact during pendency of Pre-Complaint #1-26-0304-002.
Count IIQuestion Presented — Designated Officer Supervisory LiabilityB&P §10159.2

Mr. Rosas is the Designated Officer of both corporate licenses Mr. Le has operated under. Mr. Le never left the Rosas-supervised umbrella. Every alleged violation by Mr. Le — trust-fund routing, dual-agency non-disclosure, post-detachment check handling — is alleged to have occurred under Mr. Rosas’s §10159.2 personal supervisory obligation.

Count IIIQuestion Presented — Prior Discipline — 30-Year Pattern Across Successive Corporate Brokers Mr. Rosas Has Served as Designated OfficerB&P §10177(d) · B&P §10177(g)
CaseDateViolationMr. Rosas's Role
H-24244 LAAug 31, 1990Desist and Refrain Order against Mulhearn Realtors Inc.Same corporate-entity lineage
H-24243 LAAug 6, 199130-day suspensions of MRI and Bruce Mulhearn (stayed)Same corporate-entity lineage
H-28384 LAOct 4, 200045-day suspensions of MRI and Bruce Mulhearn (stayed for one year). Violations of Code §§10145(a), 10176(e), 10177(d), 10177(g) and Regulations 2831, 2831.2, 2832.1, 2834, 2835.Same corporate-entity lineage; §10177(g) charged — same statute now applicable to Mr. Rosas
H-41672 LAFiled May 18, 2020
Stipulation signed by Mr. Rosas Jan 5, 2021
Effective Mar 4, 2021
Public reproval. Three Causes of Action: (i) Unlicensed Activity — Code §10166.02 (unlicensed mortgage-loan-originator activity); (ii) Substantial Misrepresentation — Code §10176(a); (iii) Negligence — Code §10177(g). Filed by DRE Counsel Julie L. To (SBN 219482), 320 W 4th St Ste 350, Los Angeles. Signed by Chika Sunquist, Supervising Special Investigator, on May 4, 2020. The Accusation alleged that Mulhearn Realtors Inc. presented itself as the loan originator on Mortgage Loan Disclosure Statements / Good Faith Estimates and Uniform Residential Loan Applications, while routing the borrowers’ loan applications to Keswick Financial Group Inc. — a separate finance-lender entity not licensed by DRE in any capacity, jointly owned by Bruce and Tomazina Mulhearn at the same Cerritos main address. Two specific borrower transactions named in the Accusation: Borrower Richardo G. (July 12, 2017 GFE; July 17, 2017 Loan Application; conventional loan $248,000 at fixed 10.00%); Borrower Reda B. (May 3, 2018 GFE and Loan Application; conventional loan $32,119 at fixed 10.00%). In June 8, 2018 correspondence to DRE, Bruce Mulhearn admitted: “I was surprised to learn that the Mulhearn Realtors, Inc. entity was inadvertently indicated as originator of this and possibly a few other files, instead of my affiliate firm, Keswick Financial Group, Inc.”Mr. Rosas personally signed the stipulation on January 5, 2021 as Designated Officer of Mulhearn Realtors Inc. (BHHS California Properties DBA active throughout). The signature is a personal admission of the §10166.02, §10176(a), and §10177(g) facts, under the BHHS brand, three years before the Gasio lease was executed under his ongoing supervisory umbrella. Same structural pattern: corporate broker presents itself to the consumer while a different entity actually receives the funds.
Count IVQuestion Presented — Branch Manager Notice — Sandoval Knowledge Chain — Eight Days Pre-UD-FilingB&P §10159.2 · Cal. Civ. Code §1942.5

On June 25, 2024 between 5:55 and 6:02 PM PDT — eight days before the unlawful-detainer complaint was filed by Phat L.K. Tran’s counsel of record on July 3, 2024 — Branch Manager Angie M. Sandoval (DRE #01130478), then at 5848 Edinger Avenue, received a personal-cell SMS transmission from Plaintiff containing the demand-letter image, a written warning regarding Mr. Le’s conduct on the BHHS instrument, the unaccounted cashier’s check, the “month skipped, $5,000 pocketed” framing, and the HBPD “concerned” characterization. Carrier records preserved. Ms. Sandoval’s actual notice as branch manager at the check-delivery address flows up to Mr. Rosas as Designated Officer under B&P §10159.2. Above Ms. Sandoval in the corporate supervisory chain sits Iris Fay Tonti (DRE #00844023), Division Manager. The unlawful-detainer proceeding nevertheless continued to trial. Cross-anchored at actor-silverstein.html Pretrial Notice Channel N-07 and at actor-hansonle.html Count XIII.

Count VQuestion Presented — Dual Corporate DBA AnomalyB&P §10177(g)

BHHS California Properties DBA ran under both Mulhearn Realtors Inc (#00338699, active through Sept 26, 2024) and Springdale Marina Inc (#01208606) simultaneously during 2024, both under Mr. Rosas as Designated Officer. A tenant signing a BHHS-branded lease in April 2024 could not have determined which entity’s trust-account obligations applied. Neither maintained a trust account for the Gasio tenancy.

Count VIQuestion Presented — Direct Notice via BHHS Corporate Web-Form Channels — Two Submissions, No Documented ResponseB&P §10159.2 · B&P §10177(g) · B&P §10177(h) (failure to supervise)

The Plaintiff transmitted notice of Mr. Le’s alleged conduct through two separate corporate-channel web forms published by Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices itself: (i) the “General Question” form on bhhscalifornia.com (the franchise Mr. Rosas leads as President & Principal Broker, operated through his Stratton-LFCA Inc. corporate license); and (ii) the “How can we assist you?” form on the parent BHHS HomeServices website (which the form itself characterizes as routing to the “independently owned and operated franchisees”). Each submission named the property at 19235 Brynn Court, Mr. Le by name and license number, the cashier’s check sent to BHHS by Registered Mail, the Three-Day Notice service, and the demand for response. The corporate response in each case has not appeared on the documentary record.

The submissions are preserved as Form 1 and Form 2 in the evidence section above, with the Plaintiff’s verbatim text reproduced. Carrier records and the BHHS server-side form-submission record are subpoena targets. Together with the three documented voice contacts (Calls #1, #2, and #3) and the June 25, 2024 5:55–6:02 PM PDT pre-eviction direct-notice text to Branch Manager Sandoval, the corporate-web-form channels constitute a documented multi-channel notice record to the Rosas-supervised BHHS California Properties branch and to its parent company. Each independent channel placed the corporate broker on actual notice; the documentary record reflects no investigative or supervisory response.

Primary sources

Scope and allegation standard. All characterizations of conduct are allegations based on primary-source documentary evidence. No determination of liability has been made by any court or regulatory body.
Case Caption
Gasio v. Tran et al.OC Superior Court · Limited Civil
No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC
Dept. C61 · Comm. Snuggs-Spraggins
Publication
The Gasio MirrorActor Dossier — Dennis Allen Rosas
Edition: Saturday · May 9, 2026
gasiomirror.com
Discipline
DRE Pre-ComplaintPC #1-26-0304-002 (companion)
Stipulation H-41672 LA · Jan 5, 2021
No finding has been made.
Inquiries & Corrections
Michael A. Gasio, Publishergasio77@yahoo.com
Huntington Beach, CA 92646
Pro se plaintiff
Authorities consulted · Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 10145, 10159.2, 10176, 10177 · Cal. Evid. Code § 913 · Pen. Code § 502
actor-rosas.html · v7.1 · Black Diamond ❄ MY Project 2026 ™ · V5.5 scrub lock
© 1996—2026 Michael A. Gasio · All rights reserved · gasiomirror.com
Allegation framing throughout · No finding has been made · Documentary record only
Cal. Evid. Code § 913 — no adverse inference · noindex / nofollow

Notice to reader · scope and disclaimers

This site is a public-interest case file assembled and published by Michael A. Gasio, plaintiff pro se in Gasio v. Tran et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC. The plaintiff is not an attorney. Nothing on this site constitutes legal advice.

Every factual assertion is drawn from primary documents — executed contracts, bank records, emails, text messages, court filings, public licensing records, and public-records directory entries — preserved in the case file and referenced by source and date.

No statement on this site should be read as a determination that any named person has committed a crime, violated a statute, or breached a professional duty. Those determinations are reserved to qualified counsel, regulatory agencies, and the courts.

This publication is made in the exercise of rights protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 2 of the California Constitution, California Civil Code § 47(d), and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.

§Publisher's Notice & Copyright Reservation

gasiomirror.com is published as press under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution of the State of California. The publisher is the author. Editorial control rests with the publisher.

The publisher selects what is published, when, and for how long. Prior editions are not retained on this site for public access — no more than any newspaper or magazine retains its back issues on its racks.

Historical preservation is the work of the Internet Archive, an independent institution. If back issues of this publication exist, they exist there, outside the publisher's hands. The publisher makes no representation about what any prior edition contained or whether any particular edition was captured.

Source documents are not held here. They are held by the Orange County Superior Court (Case No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC) and by the regulatory agencies catalogued under Agency Proceedings. Inquiries about source documents belong with them.

©Copyright Reservation

© 1996–2026 Michael A. Gasio. All rights reserved.

The contents of this website — including the editorial text, compilations, commentary, captions, photographs, screen captures, audio recordings, video recordings, the underlying HTML source code and stylesheets, the JavaScript, the SVG graphics, the embedded data structures, the document selection and arrangement, and the editorial sequencing of evidentiary exhibits — constitute the original work of the publisher and are protected as literary, pictorial, audiovisual, and compilation works under the following authorities:

This site is made publicly accessible at no charge as a public-interest record. Free access does not constitute a license, transfer, or waiver of any right reserved under 17 U.S.C. § 106. No portion of the publisher's exclusive rights is implied, granted, or extended by the act of public viewing.

Prohibited absent prior written authorization from the publisher: Expressly permitted:

Primary-source documents authored by third parties — court filings, agency correspondence, recorded instruments, and other public records — are reproduced as evidentiary exhibits. The publisher does not claim copyright in those underlying public records. The publisher's copyright extends to the editorial compilation, the commentary, the captions, the arrangement, the selection, and all original works produced by the publisher.

Enforcement:

The publisher will pursue all available legal remedies against any party who infringes the rights reserved herein. Available remedies include:

The publisher reserves the right to pursue any and all of the foregoing remedies, in any combination, in any forum of competent jurisdiction, with or without prior notice to the infringing party where prior notice is not required by law.

DMCA notices and counter-notices under 17 U.S.C. § 512 may be directed to the publisher in writing: gasio77@yahoo.com