Integrated criminal / civil overview under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968
This page consolidates the statutory framework, actors, and predicate acts that define the pattern of racketeering activity at issue. It is written for simultaneous use by criminal investigators (DA / FBI / DOJ) and by private or government counsel pursuing civil recovery.
The evidence demonstrates an association-in-fact enterprise consisting of cooperating individuals and licensed business entities engaged in a single objective: obtaining or retaining rental property and related funds through fraudulent or coercive means.
Evidence Refs: T1 – T25, Damages Recovery Summary, Chain of Custody Records.
| # | Date / Period | Act / Conduct | Statute | Key Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apr 2024 | Transmission of renewal lease by email / mail containing altered terms. | 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud) | T1 Lease Renewal; Postal Receipt T6 |
| 2 | Apr–Jun 2024 | Electronic diversion of rent deposits and duplicate payment requests. | 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud) | Bank Records T2 & T9; Emails T5 |
| 3 | Jun 2024 | Threat of eviction to compel second payment outside contract. | Cal. Pen. Code § 518 (Extortion); 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) | Three-Day Notice T4; Text Msgs T5 |
| 4 | Jul 2024 | Use of court filings containing misrepresentations of payment status. | 18 U.S.C. § 1341 / 1343 (Mail & Wire Fraud) | UD Filing T8; Correspondence T17 |
| 5 | Aug 2024 | Property re-listed interstate via online platform at 54 % higher rent before case resolved. | 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud) | Listing Screens T18; Permit Lookup T13 |
| 6 | 2024–2025 | Retention of tenant improvements (~500 sq ft) without restitution. | Cal. Civ. Code §§ 3336–3340 (Conversion); 18 U.S.C. § 2314 (Transportation of Stolen Property) | Contractor Estimate T12; Photos T10 |
The acts above occurred within a 16-month span and were executed through consistent channels — electronic bank transfers, postal mail, and court filings — all directed toward a single economic objective. Together they establish both the relationship and continuity required by 18 U.S.C. § 1961(5):
Any person injured in business or property by reason of a RICO violation may sue for three times the actual damages sustained, plus costs and reasonable attorney’s fees. The documented base loss ($150 000) supports treble recovery of approximately $450 000–$600 000, with additional punitive exposure under California statutes.
Federal criminal penalties under § 1963 include:
State-level exposure under California Penal Code §§ 518–524 carries 2–4 years per count and restitution to victims. Cross-referral between county and federal authorities is appropriate where interstate transactions (mail, wire, online platforms) are involved.