Authorities Ledger
Every Statute & Case in the Portal · A Reading Index for Counsel
For Counsel · Reference Appendix · v2
Gasio v. Tran et al. · OCSC No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC · Dept. C61
A plain-language index of every statute, code section, and reported case cited across the for-counsel portal — what each authority is, what it means in ordinary terms, and which pages rely on it. Built to be wired, entry by entry, to the fact anchors on the Evidence Index (evidence.html#N).
How this was built. Every entry below was extracted from the source pages themselves —
63 statute sections and 45 cases — not from recollection.
Statute meanings are stated at the level of settled black-letter. Case citations are the ones printed on the
pages; six cases were checked against authoritative sources today, and one mislabeled holding (Doe v. Glanzer) was corrected. The publication
and copyright sections (17 U.S.C. §§ 101–1203, Civ. §§ 980–989, Pen. § 502)
are footer boilerplate, not case authorities, and are noted at the end rather than listed.
✓ verified — checked against an authoritative source today
● established — canonical holding; cite from source
◕ standard — settled statute, stable meaning
⚠ confirm — holding/cite to be pulled from source
Part ILaws & Codes
California Civil Code
| Section | What it means, in plain terms | Where used | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| § 47(d) | Fair-report privilege — protects a fair and true report of a public proceeding; part of the publication footing. | most pages (footer) | ◕ |
| § 827 | Notice required to change terms of a month-to-month tenancy (e.g., a rent increase). | authorities-pending | ◕ |
| § 1102 | Seller/transferor real-property disclosure duties. | state-civil | ◕ |
| § 1567 / §§ 1569–1577 | Consent obtained by duress, menace, fraud, or undue influence is not real consent — contract-formation defenses. | many | ◕ |
| § 1572 | Actual fraud — intentional misrepresentation or concealment to induce a contract. | damages · doctrinal · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 1709 / § 1710 | Deceit and its definitions (misrepresentation, concealment of a known material fact, false promise). | damages · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 1717 | Makes a one-sided contractual attorney-fee clause reciprocal; fees to the prevailing party on the contract. | damages · doctrinal · exec · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 1927 | Lessor's covenant of quiet enjoyment / quiet possession for the tenant. | the-ultimatum | ◕ |
| § 1941 / § 1941.1 / § 1942 / § 1942.4 | Implied warranty of habitability (§ 1941.1 lists untenantable conditions), repair-and-deduct (§ 1942), and the bar on collecting rent on a substandard unit (§ 1942.4). | many | ◕ |
| § 1942.5 (d)(f)(2)(g)(i) | Anti-retaliation — bars eviction or penalty for a tenant exercising protected rights within the statutory window. | many | ◕ |
| § 1945 | Presumed renewal of a lease where the tenant holds over and the landlord accepts rent. | the-post-notice-demand | ◕ |
| § 1946.2 (b)(1)(K) | Tenant Protection Act 'just cause' eviction statute; (b)(1)(K) concerns the tenant's own written notice to terminate. | doctrinal · post-notice · related · exec | ◕ |
| § 1947.12 | Statewide rent cap (AB 1482). | the-post-notice-demand | ◕ |
| § 1950.5 (b)(l) | Security deposits — permissible deductions, itemization, and return; (l) sets the closed list and bad-faith penalty. | many | ◕ |
| § 3294 | Punitive damages on clear-and-convincing proof of oppression, fraud, or malice. | damages · doctrinal · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 3345 | Trebles penalty-natured remedies in actions by senior or disabled persons. | many | ◕ |
| § 3439.04 | Uniform Voidable Transactions Act — a transfer made with intent to hinder creditors (the 'badges of fraud'). | federal-civil · jeopardy | ◕ |
Code of Civil Procedure
| Section | What it means, in plain terms | Where used | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| § 1033.5 | Items recoverable as litigation costs. | exec · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 1161 / § 1161(2) | Defines unlawful detainer; (2) is the nonpayment ground. Strict statutory compliance is required. | doctrinal · exec · index | ◕ |
| § 2015.5 | Form for a declaration under penalty of perjury. | the-post-notice-demand | ◕ |
| § 473(d) | Power to set aside a void judgment or order. | evidence-index | ◕ |
| § 724.050 | Demand for, and duty to file, acknowledgment of satisfaction of judgment. | evidence-index · federal-civil | ◕ |
Evidence Code
| Section | What it means, in plain terms | Where used | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| § 913 | No adverse inference may be drawn from a party's silence or election not to respond. Standing rule of construction on every page. | all pages | ◕ |
| § 1221 | Adoptive admission — a statement a party has manifested adopting as true. | state-civil | ◕ |
| §§ 1400–1402 | Authentication of writings. | evidence-index | ◕ |
Penal Code
| Section | What it means, in plain terms | Where used | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| § 115 | Knowingly offering a false or forged instrument for filing in a public office. | criminal · exec | ◕ |
| § 118 | Perjury. | criminal | ◕ |
| § 132 / § 134 | Offering false written evidence (§ 132); preparing false evidence (§ 134). | criminal · others | ◕ |
| § 182 | Criminal conspiracy. | criminal | ◕ |
| § 470 | Forgery. | criminal | ◕ |
| § 484 / § 503 / § 532 | Theft (§ 484); embezzlement (§ 503); theft by false pretense (§ 532). | criminal | ◕ |
| § 502 | Unauthorized computer-data access (CDAFA) — cited in the site-access reservation. | post-notice · ultimatum | ◕ |
| §§ 518–524 | Extortion — obtaining property by a wrongful threat (incl. threat to accuse of crime). Framed as the question presented for the post-notice demand. | post-notice · criminal · jeopardy · ultimatum | ◕ |
Business & Professions Code
| Section | What it means, in plain terms | Where used | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| § 6068 (c)(d)(m) | Attorney duties — (d) never mislead a judge by false statement of fact or law; (c) counsel only just causes; (m) keep clients informed. | many | ◕ |
| § 6103 | Willful breach of an attorney's oath or duties; ground for discipline. | state-civil | ◕ |
| § 6106 | Acts of moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption — ground for attorney discipline. | jeopardy · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 6128 (a)(b) | Attorney deceit or collusion with intent to deceive a court or party (a misdemeanor). | many | ◕ |
| § 7090 (a) / § 7113 | Contractors State License Board discipline; grounds for action against a contractor's license. | jeopardy · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 10130 | Bars unlicensed real-estate activity. | jeopardy | ◕ |
| § 10145 (a) | Broker trust-fund duty — client money must be held in trust, not in a personal account. | many | ◕ |
| § 10159.2 | A broker's responsibility to supervise the salespersons licensed under them. | jeopardy · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 10166.02 | Mortgage loan-originator licensing endorsement requirements. | jeopardy · state-civil | ◕ |
| § 10176 (a)(e) / § 10177 (d)(g) | Grounds for licensee discipline — misrepresentation, dishonest dealing, and related conduct. | many | ◕ |
| § 10471 | Real Estate Recovery Account — fund to pay victims of licensee fraud. | state-civil | ◕ |
| § 17200 / § 17203 / § 17206 | Unfair Competition Law — bars unlawful/unfair/fraudulent acts (§ 17200); restitution & injunction (§ 17203); civil penalties (§ 17206). | many | ◕ |
| § 17500 | False or misleading advertising. | authorities-pending · jeopardy · state-civil | ◕ |
Welfare & Institutions · Probate · Health & Safety
| Section | What it means, in plain terms | Where used | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Welf. & Inst. § 15610.27 / § 15610.30 | Defines 'elder' and 'financial abuse' of an elder or dependent adult. | damages · state-civil · jeopardy | ◕ |
| Welf. & Inst. § 15657.5 (a) | Enhanced remedies (attorney's fees; uncapped recovery) for financial elder abuse. | many | ◕ |
| Prob. § 859 | Double damages where property is taken from an elder or dependent adult in bad faith. | damages · doctrinal · state-civil | ◕ |
| Health & Saf. § 17920.3 | Defines substandard housing for code-enforcement purposes. | state-civil | ◕ |
Federal
| Section | What it means, in plain terms | Where used | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 U.S.C. § 1341 | Mail fraud. | many | ◕ |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1343 | Wire fraud. | criminal · jeopardy | ◕ |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1344 | Bank fraud. | criminal | ◕ |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1708 | Theft or receipt of stolen mail. | authorities-pending · criminal | ◕ |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1951 | Hobbs Act — extortion or robbery affecting commerce. | criminal · post-notice | ◕ |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1957 | Engaging in monetary transactions in criminally-derived property (money laundering). | criminal | ◕ |
| 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1964 | RICO — definitions & 'pattern' (§ 1961), prohibited acts (§ 1962), and the civil treble-damages action (§ 1964(c)). | many | ◕ |
| 18 U.S.C. § 3631 | Criminal interference with fair-housing rights. | authorities-pending · criminal | ◕ |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 | Civil action for deprivation of rights under color of state law. | federal-civil | ◕ |
| 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. (§§ 3604, 3613, 3617) | Fair Housing Act — discrimination prohibitions (§ 3604), private enforcement (§ 3613), and the bar on coercion/retaliation (§ 3617). | many | ◕ |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 | Fair Debt Collection Practices Act — bars abusive or deceptive debt-collection conduct. | many | ◕ |
| 15 U.S.C. § 45 | FTC Act § 5 — unfair or deceptive acts or practices. | authorities-pending | ◕ |
| 12 U.S.C. § 5481 / § 5536 | Consumer Financial Protection Act — bars unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices. | authorities-pending · federal-civil | ◕ |
Part IICourt Cases
Each case in one line — what it held and why it appears. Companion dockets are kept separate and carry no adopted finding.
RICO (federal)
| Case | Citation · Court / Year | Quick holding & relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co. | 473 U.S. 479 · U.S. · 1985 | Civil RICO needs no prior criminal conviction; injury flowing from the predicate acts is enough to sue. | ● |
| H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co. | 492 U.S. 229 · U.S. · 1989 | RICO 'pattern' = related predicate acts plus continuity (the relationship-plus-continuity test). | ● |
| Reves v. Ernst & Young | 507 U.S. 170 · U.S. · 1993 | § 1962(c) liability requires some part in the 'operation or management' of the enterprise. | ● |
| Boyle v. United States | 556 U.S. 938 · U.S. · 2009 | An associated-in-fact 'enterprise' needs only a purpose, relationships, and enough longevity — no formal structure. | ● |
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
| Case | Citation · Court / Year | Quick holding & relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heintz v. Jenkins | 514 U.S. 291 · U.S. · 1995 | The FDCPA reaches attorneys who regularly collect consumer debts through litigation. | ● |
| Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich | 559 U.S. 573 · U.S. · 2010 | The FDCPA 'bona fide error' defense does not excuse mistakes of law. | ● |
| Gammon v. GC Servs. Ltd. P'ship | 7th Cir. · 1994 | Deception under the FDCPA is judged by an unsophisticated-consumer standard. | ● |
| Bencomo v. Forster & Garbus LLP | E.D. Wis. · 2019 · No. 18-cv-1259 | FDCPA — attorneys may act as debt collectors without violating the Act so long as they are clear about the capacity in which they act; a clear attorney-involvement disclaimer defeats a § 1692e false-attorney-review claim. | ✓ |
Fair Housing Act & discrimination
| Case | Citation · Court / Year | Quick holding & relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. | 409 U.S. 205 · U.S. · 1972 | Fair Housing Act standing is construed broadly. | ● |
| Meyer v. Holley | 537 U.S. 280 · U.S. · 2003 | FHA vicarious liability follows ordinary agency/respondeat-superior principles. | ● |
| Texas Dept. of Housing & Cmty. Affairs v. Inclusive Communities | 576 U.S. 519 · U.S. · 2015 | Disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. | ● |
| Bloch v. Frischholz | 7th Cir. · 2009 | The FHA reaches post-acquisition discrimination and § 3617 interference. | ● |
| McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green | 411 U.S. 792 · U.S. · 1973 | The burden-shifting framework for proving discrimination by inference. | ● |
Civil-rights / color of law (§ 1983)
| Case | Citation · Court / Year | Quick holding & relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polk County v. Dodson | 454 U.S. 312 · U.S. · 1981 | A public defender does not act 'under color of state law' for § 1983. | ● |
| West v. Atkins | 487 U.S. 42 · U.S. · 1988 | A private party performing a state function under contract can act 'under color of state law.' | ● |
Knowledge, punitive limits & silence
| Case | Citation · Court / Year | Quick holding & relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Global-Tech Appliances v. SEB S.A. | 563 U.S. 754 · U.S. · 2011 | Willful blindness can satisfy a knowledge requirement. | ● |
| State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Campbell | 538 U.S. 408 · U.S. · 2003 | Due process limits the ratio of punitive to compensatory damages. | ● |
| Griffin v. California | 380 U.S. 609 · U.S. · 1965 | No adverse comment on a criminal defendant's silence (Fifth Amendment). | ● |
| Baxter v. Palmigiano | 425 U.S. 308 · U.S. · 1976 | In civil proceedings, an adverse inference from silence is permitted — the contrast to Griffin. | ● |
| Doe v. Rudy-Glanzer (Doe v. Glanzer) | 232 F.3d 1258 · 9th Cir. · 2000 | In a civil case, limits when an adverse inference may be drawn from a party's Fifth Amendment refusal to answer; the privilege is asserted question-by-question. | ✓ |
California landlord-tenant, fraud, fees & discipline
| Case | Citation · Court / Year | Quick holding & relevance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stancil v. Superior Court | 11 Cal.5th 381 · Cal. · 2021 | A motion to quash is not the way to test whether a UD complaint states a cause of action; use demurrer or answer. | ✓ |
| Attenello v. Basilious | OC Sup. Ct. App. Div., No. 30-2021-01209364 · cert. pub. Oct 26, 2022 | A landlord-supplied rent-forgiveness/termination agreement is not the tenant's § 1946.2 written notice and states no UD cause of action. Same plaintiff's counsel (Silverstein). | ✓ |
| Green v. Superior Court | 10 Cal.3d 616 · Cal. · 1974 | Established the implied warranty of habitability in residential leases; breach is a defense to unlawful detainer. | ● |
| Horiike v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage | 1 Cal.5th 1024, 1040 · Cal. · 2016 | Where one broker represents both sides, the salesperson's fiduciary duty to the seller can extend to the buyer. | ● |
| Clark v. Superior Court | 50 Cal.4th 605, 614 · Cal. · 2010 | Civ. § 3345 trebling reaches only penalty-natured remedies. | ● |
| Hsu v. Abbara | 9 Cal.4th 863 · Cal. · 1995 | Determining the 'prevailing party' for § 1717 contractual attorney fees. | ● |
| Santisas v. Goodin | 17 Cal.4th 599 · Cal. · 1998 | Scope of § 1717 and contractual fee clauses, including tort claims. | ● |
| Cel-Tech Communications v. L.A. Cellular | 20 Cal.4th 163 · Cal. · 1999 | Defines what is 'unfair' under the Unfair Competition Law. | ● |
| Flatley v. Mauro | 39 Cal.4th 299 · Cal. · 2006 | Conduct that is extortion as a matter of law is not protected petitioning and gets no anti-SLAPP shield. | ● |
| People v. Beggs | 178 Cal. 79 · Cal. · 1918 | A threat to accuse someone of a crime to obtain property is extortion even if the accusation is true. | ● |
| Paine v. State Bar | 14 Cal.2d 150, 154 · Cal. · 1939 | An attorney's duty to the client is matched by an equally imperative duty to aid the court in avoiding error; misleading the court by a false document warrants discipline. | ✓ |
| Giovanazzi v. State Bar | 28 Cal.3d 465 · Cal. · 1980 | Attorney discipline; conduct involving moral turpitude. | ● |
| U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall P'ship | 513 U.S. 18 · U.S. · 1994 | Appellate vacatur is not automatic on settlement — it is equitable and usually denied. Cited re the Bea-Mone vacatur. | ● |
| Granberry v. Islay Investments | 9 Cal.4th 738 · Cal. · 1995 | A landlord's good-faith failure to meet § 1950.5(f)'s three-week itemization/return deadline does not automatically bar a setoff for legitimate deductions, but the setoff must be proven. | ✓ |
| Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. | 47 Cal.3d 654 · Cal. · 1988 | Tort damages are generally unavailable for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; the covenant ordinarily sounds in contract, not tort. | ● |
| Hood v. Hartford Life | — · to confirm | Cited authority — full citation, holding, and relevance to confirm from source. | ⚠ |
| Nourafchan v. Miner | — · to confirm | Cited authority — citation/pin to confirm from source (prior pin correction noted). | ⚠ |
| Bevill v. Zoura | — · to confirm | Cited authority — full citation and holding to confirm from source. | ⚠ |
| Levitz Furniture v. Wingtip Communications | — · to confirm | Cited authority — full citation and holding to confirm from source. | ⚠ |
| WDT-Winchester v. Nilsson | — · to confirm | Cited authority — full citation and holding to confirm from source. | ⚠ |
Companion dockets — context only, no finding adopted
| Case | Court / No. | Why it appears | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gasio v. Tran et al. | OC Sup. Ct. No. 30-2024-01410991-CL-UD-CJC · Dept. C61 | The primary case — the unlawful-detainer matter this record concerns. | ✓ |
| Tran v. Harman | OC Sup. Ct. No. 30-2021-01237695 · prior | Prior tenancy at the same property, same plaintiff/counsel chain. Companion docket. | ● |
| Tran v. Bach | OC Sup. Ct. No. 30-2018-00982394 · prior | Prior UD by Thao Thu Tran, same case type and plaintiff's counsel. Docket cross-reference. | ● |
| Huynh v. Tran/Ly | OC Sup. Ct. No. 30-2025-01502635-CU-FR-CJC · parallel | Parallel fraud matter involving the same family network. Context only. | ● |
| Bea-Mone v. Silverstein | docket existence only · set aside 2019 | Verdict set aside on stipulation Oct 2019, dismissed with prejudice — no surviving adjudication of liability. Cited only to disambiguate counsel. | ● |
Next pass. The entries marked ⚠ confirm are the handful of less-common
California authorities whose holdings I will verify against an authoritative source rather than state from memory
— the same check already run on Stancil and Attenello. After that, each row gets wired to
the specific exhibit(s) it rests on, addressable as evidence.html#N.